← All Learn posts
Why Standard Templates Fail in Australia

Why Standard Templates Fail in Australia

Rashdan·19 Oct 2026·2 min readJurisdiction

Most feasibility models are built for standard progress payment structures. In Australia, off-the-plan sales work differently — and that difference can quietly destroy your project's cashflow.

The 10/90 Rule: How Settlement Actually Works

In Australia, off-the-plan buyers pay just 10% at contract. The remaining 90% isn't due until practical completion — often 2 to 3 years later.

  • 10% — Day 1: buyer deposit on exchange of contracts
  • 90% — Completion: balance due at practical completion (2–3 years later)

The Trap: Front-Loaded Equity & Heavy Interest Carry

  • Equity is front-loaded — without the 90% settlement, developer equity must cover far more of the construction cost upfront; standard templates underestimate this dramatically
  • Interest accrual is heavier — construction loan interest compounds over the full build period with no offsetting settlement receipts; the carry is much larger than generic models predict
  • Loan sizing is off — if your model doesn't account for delayed receipts, your construction loan will be undersized from the outset

A 3-Month Delay Can Blow Up Your Interest Reserve

In a 10/90 structure, the 10% deposit is kept in escrow and you don't receive both the 10% deposit and the 90% settlement capital until completion. A delay doesn't just push your timeline — it extends your interest-bearing period with zero offsetting income.

A 3-month delay doesn't just cost time. It compounds interest on the full loan balance, with no settlement receipts to offset it. Your interest reserve can be exhausted before completion.

On-time completion: interest reserve intact, 90% received at practical completion, project viable. Three months late: interest reserve blown, no 90% receipt, cashflow crisis at Month 18.

How Generic Excel Templates Get It Wrong

Standard feasibility templates assume standard progress payment cashflows — staged receipts throughout construction. They do not model the 10/90 structure natively.

  • Assume staged settlement receipts — templates treat buyer payments as evenly distributed, not deferred to completion
  • Understate the construction loan — without the correct cashflow timing, loan sizing is optimistic and equity gaps appear mid-build
  • Miss the interest reserve risk — delays are treated as minor, not as events that can exhaust your entire interest reserve

FeasiBuild: Native 10/90 Cashflow Waterfalls

FeasiBuild is built for the Australian market. The 10/90 structure isn't a workaround — it's the default.

  • Automatic 90% deferral — the cashflow waterfall delays the 90% receipt to practical completion, no manual adjustments required
  • Correct interest carry — construction loan interest is calculated on the true outstanding balance, reflecting the delayed settlement reality
  • Proper loan sizing — your construction loan is sized to the actual equity gap, not an optimistic template assumption

Run your first Australian scenario free on the Explorer tier — and see what your template has been hiding. feasibuild.app

Slide deck

Download the slide deck (PDF)

Run this analysis yourself — first report free at feasibuild.app

Start your first report

Related posts