
Why Standard Templates Fail in Australia
Most feasibility models are built for standard progress payment structures. In Australia, off-the-plan sales work differently — and that difference can quietly destroy your project's cashflow.
The 10/90 Rule: How Settlement Actually Works
In Australia, off-the-plan buyers pay just 10% at contract. The remaining 90% isn't due until practical completion — often 2 to 3 years later.
- 10% — Day 1: buyer deposit on exchange of contracts
- 90% — Completion: balance due at practical completion (2–3 years later)
The Trap: Front-Loaded Equity & Heavy Interest Carry
- Equity is front-loaded — without the 90% settlement, developer equity must cover far more of the construction cost upfront; standard templates underestimate this dramatically
- Interest accrual is heavier — construction loan interest compounds over the full build period with no offsetting settlement receipts; the carry is much larger than generic models predict
- Loan sizing is off — if your model doesn't account for delayed receipts, your construction loan will be undersized from the outset
A 3-Month Delay Can Blow Up Your Interest Reserve
In a 10/90 structure, the 10% deposit is kept in escrow and you don't receive both the 10% deposit and the 90% settlement capital until completion. A delay doesn't just push your timeline — it extends your interest-bearing period with zero offsetting income.
A 3-month delay doesn't just cost time. It compounds interest on the full loan balance, with no settlement receipts to offset it. Your interest reserve can be exhausted before completion.
On-time completion: interest reserve intact, 90% received at practical completion, project viable. Three months late: interest reserve blown, no 90% receipt, cashflow crisis at Month 18.
How Generic Excel Templates Get It Wrong
Standard feasibility templates assume standard progress payment cashflows — staged receipts throughout construction. They do not model the 10/90 structure natively.
- Assume staged settlement receipts — templates treat buyer payments as evenly distributed, not deferred to completion
- Understate the construction loan — without the correct cashflow timing, loan sizing is optimistic and equity gaps appear mid-build
- Miss the interest reserve risk — delays are treated as minor, not as events that can exhaust your entire interest reserve
FeasiBuild: Native 10/90 Cashflow Waterfalls
FeasiBuild is built for the Australian market. The 10/90 structure isn't a workaround — it's the default.
- Automatic 90% deferral — the cashflow waterfall delays the 90% receipt to practical completion, no manual adjustments required
- Correct interest carry — construction loan interest is calculated on the true outstanding balance, reflecting the delayed settlement reality
- Proper loan sizing — your construction loan is sized to the actual equity gap, not an optimistic template assumption
Run your first Australian scenario free on the Explorer tier — and see what your template has been hiding. feasibuild.app
Slide deck
Download the slide deck (PDF)Run this analysis yourself — first report free at feasibuild.app
Start your first reportRelated posts

Seven Escrow Regimes. One Cashflow Engine.
How FeasiBuild models off-plan buyer-payment rules natively — from Dubai's Law No. 8 to India's RERA 70/30. One engine. Every jurisdiction.
19 Oct 2026 • 3 min read

Why I Charge $99 for Lifetime Access — Instead of $500/Month
Two traps own this industry: the consultant ransom and the SaaS subscription. Here's the pricing philosophy behind paying once, owning the engine, and never being billed for silence.
19 Oct 2026 • 2 min read

A User Asked Me to Keep His Name Secret
When a user refuses to give a testimonial because they don't want competitors knowing their edge, you know the tool works.
24 Sep 2026 • 2 min read